The Maternal Grandsire Effect
By Cindy Vogels
Genetics work in horses and mice has produced revolutionary and exciting new insights that may influence
your canine breeding decisions.
For years, horsemen have acknowledged a phenomenon called the maternal-grandsire effect,
when outstanding males do not immediately reproduce their greatness in the next generation. Instead, they produce daughters
who are outstanding dams. An oft-cited example is Secretariat, perhaps the greatest thoroughbred of all time. Secretariat's
achievement was not matched by his direct get, who by and large were unremarkable, but rather was passed on through his daughters,
many of whom went on to produce great performers. Dog breeders, too, have noted that an extraordinary male, while not producing
extraordinary offspring, will often produce daughters who are prolific and exceptional dams. For years, there was absolutely
no scientific explanation of this phenomenon in which traits skip a generation and are passed along only by female offspring.
Recently, however, an article documenting scientific evidence of the maternal-grandsire effect appeared in issue number 242
of Equus, an outstanding horse publication. I acknowledge that article for providing me with much of the information in this
Some Genetics Background
In each cell of a dog's body there are 39 pairs of chromosomes, one set from
each parent. Each chromosome pairs off with a corresponding chromosome of the other parent, and in each chromosome there are
thousands of genes, which contain the protein codes that determine every physical trait. Within a pair of chromosomes will
be pairs of genes from each parent that determine various traits. When the genes are not in conflict with each other - both
expressing brown eyes, for example - there is no problem. However, if one chromosome contains the gene for brown eyes but
another one contains the genes for green eyes, long-accepted Mendelian theory states that only the genetically dominant chromosome
will be expressed. The theory also states that genetic dominance is unrelated to the sex of the gene donor. When both genes
are expressed, they are considered to be co-dominant. Coat color, for example, is an area in which both genes can sometimes
exert influence. Other times, both genes are recessive, but one is nonetheless more dominant than the other, thus allowing
a recessive gene to be expressed. Recessive genes may also be expressed when both contain the same protein code for a trait.
A Startling Study
In 1969, Dr. W.R. Allen startled the world with a study that seemed to indicate certain
genes might be gender-related in their expression. Allen bred horses and donkeys, and during pregnancy measured levels of
the pregnancy hormone called equine chorionic gonadotrophin (ECG). Normally this level is high in horse-horse crosses and
low in donkey-donkey crosses. According to Mendel, it should not have made any difference which species served as sire or
dam. The levels should reflect a combination of the two species, and would either be a moderate level (indicating co-dominance),
or if one species dominated, the level would be either high or low. Surprisingly, the mares (horse females) bred to donkeys
exhibited low levels of ECG, much like a donkey-donkey cross, and the jennies (female donkeys) bred to horses registered high
levels of ECG, as in a horse-horse cross. Although no definitive conclusions were reached, it appeared that the sires' genes
were the only factor affecting the ECG levels in the females. The females' genes were silent.
It was not until 1986
that the topic reappeared in the literature. A research team headed by Dr. Azim Surani used mice to create embryos in which
all the genetic material was received entirely from either one parent or the other. Since the material was transmitted in
appropriately matched pairs, Mendelian theory would have predicted that the embryos would develop normally, since it was only
the presence of two genes for each trait, and not the sex of the gene donors, that was considered relevant. Again, however,
Mendelian expectations were confounded, as the all-female gene pairings resulted in large placentas with little embryonic
material. The all-male gene pairings produced the opposite result: small placentas with large embryos. Surani's team concluded
that some genes do not follow Mendel's laws. Some are "switched on" before fertilization and are always expressed, while others
are "switched off" and never expressed. The sex of the gene donor is the factor that determines which mode a gene will fall
into. A theory called "genome imprinting" was created to account for this previously unformulated phenomenon.
example, say there is a canine gene that is paternally imprinted and, when expressed, produces three-eared dogs. When the
gene is not expressed, the dog has two ears. A three-eared male inherits the gene from his mother, but because a gene that
is paternally imprinted is switched off when passed on by a male to its offspring, he will have all two-eared offspring. His
male two-eared offspring will not produce three-eared dogs, but his daughters will, because a gene that is paternally imprinted
will be switched on in females.
Questions and Implications
Many questions still remain, and the literature
is vague on why the phenomenon might occur. Researchers point to the significance of gender-related functions. For example,
it appears that males strive to produce virulent, robust get, while females, for their own well-being, control the size of
their offspring. Imprinted genes are quite possibly involved in traits inherited polygenically. If only some of the genes
are switched on, the work of the geneticist tracking inheritance becomes more complicated.
The implications of this
finding go far beyond the world of Thoroughbred racers. Already, a number of imprinted human genes have been pinpointed. Ongoing
mapping of the canine genome should increase the likelihood of detecting imprinted genes in dogs. The most important contribution
would probably be in the realm of canine health, but eventually we might have the tools to track the inheritance of many canine
characteristics that seem capricious in their skipping of generations.
Dog breeders should be aware of this possible
maternal-grandsire effect. Keep in mind, however, that outstanding males tend to be bred to outstanding females, so even if
some of the male's desirable genes are paternally imprinted, the offspring of such matings will probably inherit some excellent
traits from their exceptional dams. For example, this year's Kentucky Derby and Preakness winner, Charismatic, was sired by
1990 Preakness winner Summer Squall, who is out of a Secretariat daughter. While Summer Squall's prowess on the track could
be traced to the maternal-grandsire effect, he seemed to pass his greatness along directly to Charismatic. However, Secretariat's
mother appears another time in Charismatic's pedigree and Secretariat's sire Bold Ruler appears twice. So, the talented colt's
lineage points back to many outstanding individuals. A pedigree, whether for dogs or horses, always contains many influences
and variables. We dog breeders tend to be impatient and are disappointed when an outstanding male does not immediately reproduce
his excellence. Remember the maternal-grandsire effect, and wait a generation.
Cindy Vogels is breeder-judge from
Littleton, Colo. She has bred Soft Coated Wheaten Terriers, Kerry Blue Terriers, Welsh Terriers and other breeds
for almost 30 years, and judges 18 terrier breeds.